TA的每日心情 | 慵懒 2020-7-26 05:11 |
---|
签到天数: 1017 天 [LV.10]大乘
|
老兵帅客 发表于 2013-4-10 00:30
从某种意义上来说,她和丘吉尔一样,属于英国上个世纪最伟大的政治家,属于民主队伍中的独裁者。没有他们 ...
I am not sure what you mean here. Churchill was fully in charge over military matters during the war, but for domestic matters, he left most of these to his coalition Labor colleagues, which is good both for him and the country, since he understood little of economics and was a disastrous Chancellor of Exchequer during 1920s. Similarly, during his second time in office from 1951-1955, he concentrated most of his time on foreign policy, leaving domestic policy formulation to the young generation. Especially after suffering a stroke in 1953, he wasn't in charge of most matters. So I am not sure labeling him as a democratic dictator is accurate.
Strong personalities always have the tendency to an authoritarian style. For businesses, this can lead to fantastic results such as Steve Jobs in Apple, or complete disaster with examples abundant. However, for affairs regarding the whole country, I don't think we should accept such risks and completely forego democratic checks and balances. As to your references of Nazis and Hitler, look how well that worked for the Germans. By 1945, millions died, the rest struggling on the brink of starvation, most of the cities were completely destroyed, the country lost large chunks of territory and was divided for more than 40 years. The rule of Hitler was a complete disaster for Germany.
|
评分
-
查看全部评分
|