TA的每日心情 | 慵懒 2020-7-26 05:11 |
---|
签到天数: 1017 天 [LV.10]大乘
|
看你们聊得这么热闹,我这几年很少读诗,也进来插一句。
我比较同意鹤梦白云上的观点,文学艺术包括诗歌很难说有什么客观的标准,完全来自读者主观的感受。我们觉得味同嚼蜡的东西别人却能被深深感动的情况很正常。乔治奥维尔写过一篇文章,谈到托尔斯泰就很不喜欢莎士比亚,实在不能理解这种几乎垃圾的东西怎么能享那么大的名。托尔斯泰一般被公认为最伟大的小说家,没有人敢说他不懂文学鉴赏,但在莎士比亚的问题上,他和主流意见的差距却会那么大。奥维尔很喜欢莎士比亚,自然不赞同托尔斯泰的看法,但是他的评论里却有这么一段,
One's first feeling is that in describing Shakespeare as a bad writer he (指托尔斯泰) is saying something demonstrably untrue. But this is not the case. In reality there is no kind of evidence or argument by which one can show that Shakespeare, or any other writer, is ‘good’. Nor is there any way of definitely proving that — for instance — Warwick Beeping is ‘bad’. Ultimately there is no test of literary merit except survival, which is itself an index to majority opinion. Artistic theories such as Tolstoy's are quite worthless, because they not only start out with arbitrary assumptions, but depend on vague terms (‘sincere’, ‘important’ and so forth) which can be interpreted in any way one chooses.
(全文在这里http://www.orwell.ru/library/essays/lear/english/e_ltf)
关于梨花体,你不喜欢很正常,但没有必要执着于说服别人。
|
评分
-
查看全部评分
|