|
|
题目在
" W& ?, \( }5 P7 O$ t( yhttp://www.aswetalk.org/bbs/blog-1753-7898.html
1 ], l* a+ p9 r, q! g2 o9 C+ H: \* a4 f
这回不明白的地方多了。还请高手指点:
5 d) H0 c4 |5 a- t9 C
- `4 }# F! w/ p9 v/ ]1.不知道。 高低中音什么的一点都不知道。不过解题思路就是找可能的组合个数。8 Y: Q) D9 T! M: G% h
# N" X. I& Z6 g+ N
2 well, I can reason a bit from the names of these optimization types. The advantage of randomized optimization is for looking for global minimum without being trapped by a local minimum (which is often the case for deterministic optimization). so far (a few years ago before I left school, to be accurate) optimization is cursed by dimensionality, and random optimization has only limited success.
6 V$ m3 ]* ^( j
' q; e' i" R- Z3. 没听说过傅里叶空间插值。如果有的话也不奇怪。那么像实空间插值类似,傅里叶空间插值能准确复原已知频率的结果。别的还有什么呢?
) I0 @' X1 n! O7 m
' a! O+ |& ?- h' O5 X0 Y4.不知道。我只知道复数比较奇妙。有个柯西定理,复函数如果一阶可导,则无穷阶可导。这在实函数是不可能的。* p0 F& l+ K) v9 F: z
可是本质区别是什么哪?
- {! C% }$ x; F }5 }/ K% b" X; |; o1 g4 ?" y1 D2 W9 L/ C e, G! X
5.一样大。0 j0 b f* E3 L+ w
. w0 _1 O+ K" k( d
6.蒙特卡洛的实质?我也不知道。它的误差是 O(1/sqrt(N)), N是sample个数。% `2 D- G2 }6 d( Q3 F3 [0 R
' U5 Q6 E/ s& V* U; ]# Z |
|