|
|
题目在# n/ y' a; F2 U" I5 b1 f9 O- _4 g
http://www.aswetalk.org/bbs/blog-1753-7898.html6 j. G8 g; U0 j
; W; l) g# H" {4 M, W
这回不明白的地方多了。还请高手指点:3 R$ c1 T6 ~5 b; G3 |$ C
6 S- e4 F( w, X" u% k1.不知道。 高低中音什么的一点都不知道。不过解题思路就是找可能的组合个数。7 b% a* c! ]7 h! x+ j
! u9 R4 k' ?& i) F. i4 U
2 well, I can reason a bit from the names of these optimization types. The advantage of randomized optimization is for looking for global minimum without being trapped by a local minimum (which is often the case for deterministic optimization). so far (a few years ago before I left school, to be accurate) optimization is cursed by dimensionality, and random optimization has only limited success. * t- C& ~% h4 u6 K: i
$ M+ S: _( ?2 g) a
3. 没听说过傅里叶空间插值。如果有的话也不奇怪。那么像实空间插值类似,傅里叶空间插值能准确复原已知频率的结果。别的还有什么呢?8 p+ L# p5 v# O
) _1 _& v; u: t4 Y( }
4.不知道。我只知道复数比较奇妙。有个柯西定理,复函数如果一阶可导,则无穷阶可导。这在实函数是不可能的。% k) K* `( C% a# l
可是本质区别是什么哪?
3 i! `0 W3 ]( y7 H; K& K1 G' M3 P' \# [" F v: i+ N( e9 w
5.一样大。1 o7 U# H0 C, C( \2 x9 }2 n n, ?$ K5 [( }
1 R' W$ D! c" u- H; X3 V6.蒙特卡洛的实质?我也不知道。它的误差是 O(1/sqrt(N)), N是sample个数。, K8 l# r0 \8 H
+ G" p* g1 M1 X0 {: [+ D$ U M
|
|