欧盟的霸王条款
不知道欧盟是谁在主事，怎么这么脑残？这两天的新闻是：欧盟重新计算了各成员国的经济，因为英国经济表现好，所以应该多交23亿欧元（17亿英镑）。英国本来的贡献应该是86亿英镑，追加相当于20%。问题是，英国并没有提交更新的GDP数据，欧盟是把灰色经济都算进去了，比如走私、贩毒、娼妓这些。天知道欧盟是怎么算出这数字的。英国当然不买账，卡梅伦要是交了这钱，他这英国人就别做了，别说英国首相了。问题是，欧盟怎么这么脑残呢？这种馊主意都能出来！上一次是航空公司碳税，所有进出欧盟成员的航班都要算全程的碳税，结果被美国、中国的联手抵制破产了。
他们还真以为这样的霸王条款都能在全世界令行禁止？ 这些数据是英国自己提交给欧盟的。
The figures released today are based on these numbers - they are calculated on the basis of a review of the economic performance and pace of growth of member states since 1995 - more accurate methods of calculating economic performance were introduced, and the readjusted calculations have been made on the basis of these.
One could even argue that countries whose growth has been significantly revised upwards had previously been underpaying when it came to EU contributions.
Did the member states know and agree to this?
Yes.
Member states are in agreement with how contributions are calculated using GNI. And, critically for this specific case argued in favour of the statistical revisions to how economic performance is calculated - for obvious reasons - these, it is worth remembering, have allowed many countries to show better than previously thought economic growth and, in some cases, a smaller debt relative to GDP.
How the bills will be paid in December remains unknown, but despite this morning’s surprised faces and bullish remarks, it is highly unlikely that member states did not know, or did not anticipate, these figures. The calculations are even based on data provided by member state governments themselves, which Eurostat, the EU’s statistical institution, then verifies.
It is likely that independently of instalments and cosmetics, Britain (and others) will need to to pay their amounts (short of choosing to leave the EU, or convincing France, Germany and others to forego their payments).
The communications, timing and politics of a billion euro bill to cover in a few weeks is of course something else, but these are the numbers.
http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2014/oct/24/britains-two-billion-euro-bill-explained
欧盟在计算GDP的时候把灰色经济算进去是有道理的。因为欧盟各国法律不同，卖淫有的国家合法，有的国家不合法，大麻在荷兰合法等。把这些算进去，计算各国财政贡献和补贴，计算财政赤字是否超过GDP3%的规定才有统一标准。
David Cameron目前遇到极右的UKIP的严重挑战，因此选择对待欧盟的态度上特别的强硬。前几天宣布正在研究限制欧盟其它各国在英国自由工作的权利。遭到欧盟委员会主席Jose Barroso的驳斥。他的强硬姿态会巩固保守党右翼对他的支持，但是对英国的长远利益来说并不是好事。
中共香港特别行政区区委书记晨枫先生，您有意竞选欧盟联邦的党主席乎？{:234:} Dracula 发表于 2014-10-24 10:56
这些数据是英国自己提交给欧盟的。
原来还有这么一层。那欧盟这么计算也算有道理。 熊掌 发表于 2014-10-24 11:10
中共香港特别行政区区委书记晨枫先生，您有意竞选欧盟联邦的党主席乎？ ...
奶们都是坏淫！把俄往火坑里推不算，还要把俄推进油锅！{:194:} 熊掌 发表于 2014-10-24 12:10
中共香港特别行政区区委书记晨枫先生，您有意竞选欧盟联邦的党主席乎？ ...
区委书记升级，应该叫欧盟联邦的党 总书记吧 {:190:} 晨枫 发表于 2014-10-24 12:13
奶们都是坏淫！把俄往火坑里推不算，还要把俄推进油锅！
补充一下，我们还会盖上盖滴。 老兵帅客 发表于 2014-10-24 18:23
补充一下，我们还会盖上盖滴。
那你们在锅里至少要放点糖衣炮弹什么的，比如几枚美女…… 晨枫 发表于 2014-10-24 18:45
那你们在锅里至少要放点糖衣炮弹什么的，比如几枚美女……
镁铝？没问题，管够！{:191:} 澹泊敬诚 发表于 2014-10-24 18:59
镁铝？没问题，管够！
一个比一个狠心啊！寒心中……{:205:} Dracula 发表于 2014-10-24 10:56
这些数据是英国自己提交给欧盟的。
好玩了！今天BBC报道，英国和荷兰要补交，但法国和德国有退款，法国退款17（？）亿欧元，德国近10亿，莫非他们国家的娼妓业（吸毒、走私好像在法国、德国也是非法的）交易量、利润率高估了？{:187:} 英国和意大利自己把卖淫记入GDP，怪不得别人:lol 晨司机就抛下俺们乌克兰不管啦！俺们还在坑里盼乌克兰妹子哪！{:194:} migi29 发表于 2014-10-24 22:20
晨司机就抛下俺们乌克兰不管啦！俺们还在坑里盼乌克兰妹子哪！
不管啦，管不了啦。{:216:} 晨枫 发表于 2014-10-25 01:13
奶们都是坏淫！把俄往火坑里推不算，还要把俄推进油锅！
哈哈哈，一口的水全喷显示屏上了！晨斯基赔我的精神损失费{:210:} 老兵帅客 发表于 2014-10-25 08:23
补充一下，我们还会盖上盖滴。
然后在下面再加把火:D 匈牙利这几年嚷着要征网络流量税
脑洞大开 太有才了。{:190:}{:191:} 边寒剑 发表于 2014-10-24 23:49
哈哈哈，一口的水全喷显示屏上了！晨斯基赔我的精神损失费
呃，叫江女神陪你吧，哦不，赔你吧。江女神近来怎么啦？你好久不贴，我们都不知道她近况了。 老兵帅客 发表于 2014-10-25 08:23
补充一下，我们还会盖上盖滴。
你俩不还是加拿大老乡吗
页:
[1]
2