爱吱声 › 标签 › research

标签: research

相关帖子	版块	作者	回复/查看	最后发表

	哈佛设计学院的15年计划和普林斯顿建筑学院之改头换面	日志随笔	到处停留的叶子 2013-12-3	15 2842	到处停留的叶子 2014-1-5 04:02

更多...

相关日志

分享《Science》最新文章：对中国审查制度的反演试验: 热度 20 九九 2014-8-27 00:12; 《Science》最新的社会科学类research article，略蛋疼 : Reverse-engineering censorship in China: Randomized experimentation and participant observation 全文链接： http://www.sciencemag.org/content/345/6199/1251722.full PDF: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/345/6199/1251722.full.pdf 还有一个贴心的structured summary, 贴过来： Science 22 August 2014: Vol. 345 no. 6199 DOI: 10.1126/science.1251722 RESEARCH ARTICLE Reverse-engineering censorship in China: Randomized experimentation and participant observation Gary King1,*, Jennifer Pan1, Margaret E. Roberts2 1Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. 2Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. Introduction Censorship has a long history in China, extending from the efforts of Emperor Qin to burn Confucian texts in the third century BCE to the control of traditional broadcast media under Communist Party rule. However, with the rise of the Internet and new media platforms, more than 1.3 billion people can now broadcast their individual views, making information far more diffuse and considerably harder to control. In response, the government has built a massive social media censorship organization, the result of which constitutes the largest selective suppression of human communication in the recorded history of any country. We show that this large system, designed to suppress information, paradoxically leaves large footprints and so reveals a great deal about itself and the intentions of the government. Rationale Chinese censorship of individual social media posts occurs at two levels: (i) Many tens of thousands of censors, working inside Chinese social media firms and government at several levels, read individual social media posts, and decide which ones to take down. (ii) They also read social media submissions that are prevented from being posted by automated keyword filters, and decide which ones to publish. To study the first level, we devised an observational study to download published Chinese social media posts before the government could censor them, and to revisit each from a worldwide network of computers to see which was censored. To study the second level, we conducted the first largescale experimental study of censorship by creating accounts on numerous social media sites throughout China, submitting texts with different randomly assigned content to each, and detecting from a worldwide network of computers which ones were censored. To find out the details of how the system works, we supplemented the typical current approach (conducting uncertain and potentially unsafe confidential interviews with insiders) with a participant observation study, in which we set up our own social media site in China. While also attempting not to alter the system we were studying, we purchased a URL, rented server space, contracted with Chinese firms to acquire the same software as used by existing social media sites, and—with direct access to their software, documentation, and even customer service help desk support—reverseengineered how it all works. Results Criticisms of the state, its leaders, and their policies are routinely published, whereas posts with collective action potential are much more likely to be censored—regardless of whether they are for or against the state (two concepts not previously distinguished in the literature). Chinese people can write the most vitriolic blog posts about even the top Chinese leaders without fear of censorship, but if they write in support of or opposition to an ongoing protest—or even about a rally in favor of a popular policy or leader—they will be censored. We clarify the internal mechanisms of the Chinese censorship apparatus and show how changes in censorship behavior reveal government intent by presaging their action on the ground. That is, it appears that criticism on the web, which was thought to be censored, is used by Chinese leaders to determine which officials are not doing their job of mollifying the people and need to be replaced. Conclusion Censorship in China is used to muzzle those outside government who attempt to spur the creation of crowds for any reason—in opposition to, in support of, or unrelated to the government. The government allows the Chinese people to say whatever they like about the state, its leaders, or their policies, because talk about any subject unconnected to collective action is not censored. The value that Chinese leaders find in allowing and then measuring criticism by hundreds of millions of Chinese people creates actionable information for them and, as a result, also for academic scholars and public policy analysts.; 306 次阅读|8 个评论

更多...

		自动登录	找回密码
密码			注册

标签: research

相关帖子

相关日志