设为首页收藏本站

爱吱声

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 5684|回复: 37
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[军事] 印度媒体吹牛编故事开始了

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    奋斗
    2019-7-13 03:21
  • 签到天数: 3 天

    [LV.2]筑基

    楼主
    发表于 2020-6-23 02:10:40 | 显示全部楼层
    老财迷 发表于 2020-6-23 00:29
    估计说的是这一篇:
    https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/3-separate-brawls-outsider-chinese-troops-m ...

    贼不打,三年自招。。。。承认打印这事发生在双方无争议的中国实控线一侧,不算太难,三哥终于做到了。

    三哥玩屁屁踢玩多了,这一脚踢到自己屁股上,还觉得挺有脸。

    The 'new' Chinese troops who had been overpowered, were forcibly taken by Colonel Babu back across the LAC. The Indian team not only wanted to deposit the encroachers back on their side, but also inspect whether there was more coming.

    The events of the previous few hours had set tactical alarm bells ringing and didn't seem like a stray occurrence. It is also possible that they witnessed some movement on the Chinese side. Either way, the crossing of the Indian team into the Chinese side would spark the second phase of the fight a full hour later.

    It was in this second brawl that most of the casualties would be inflicted.



    如果我的英语阅读理解还算及格,红字说的是:印度媒体自己招认,是印度军队进入无争议的中国一侧,然后就进入打印程序。。。。

    这个文章前面扯了好些蛋,比如把双方同时撤掉临时设施,说成中国单方面撤掉。把印度违反双方脱离接触的小动作,说成检查中国越境的正当行为。最为流氓的一点,文章省略了中方拆帐篷到原地搭建帐篷之间发生了什么;这里不用脑子也能想出来,就是中国诚心诚意按照将军级会谈的协议拆除了帐篷,印度却耍了小动作,没有拆除或者先拆后建,逼迫中国方面重返原地。

    老老实实做人,老老实实写文章,对他们要求太高了。

    点评

    油菜: 5.0 给力: 5.0
    油菜: 5 给力: 5
      发表于 2020-6-23 10:44
    油菜: 5 给力: 5
      发表于 2020-6-23 07:04

    评分

    参与人数 1爱元 +4 收起 理由
    老财迷 + 4

    查看全部评分

    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

  • TA的每日心情
    奋斗
    2019-7-13 03:21
  • 签到天数: 3 天

    [LV.2]筑基

    沙发
    发表于 2020-6-23 02:18:50 | 显示全部楼层
    本帖最后由 石工 于 2020-6-23 02:23 编辑


    这个文后面有36篇评论,按“most reply”排列,就这三篇有回复,讲的都是一件事:打印发生在中国一侧。

    出现这种情况,有两种可能:
    一是还有没被高温加疫情烧糊涂的冷静三哥
    二是有老中或者老巴冒充三哥
    再补充一个可能性:这篇报道和这几个靠前的评论,都是莫迪请的托,再吹下去牛皮爆了,每位三哥脸上糊一块,不容易摘下来呢。

    A needless rounds of deaths. It seems col Babu decision to go n visit backfied. After first brawl advice from HQ shd hv been sought. Very very brave jawans n officers indeed, but not as suspicious as shd hv been.it indeed occurred on the Chinese side.
    0
    1
    1 replies
    O
    OBAID SIDDIQUI
    Yesterday
    So it was the Indian Army that crossed LAC & dismantled & burnt the Chinese post. Instead they should have told Chinese to do it on their own.
    0
    1
    1 replies
    L
    Laxmi narayan saini
    Yesterday
    The incident has been narrated in detail. It shows that entire scuffle had taken place in Chinese territory. But in whose territory Galwan river falls- not touched. How much casualties China has suffered is not clear. Why conflicting news are aired by our Govt. Print media & injured soldiers say som
    0
    0

    点评

    油菜: 5.0 给力: 5.0
    油菜: 5 给力: 5
      发表于 2020-6-23 07:03

    评分

    参与人数 1爱元 +4 收起 理由
    老财迷 + 4

    查看全部评分

    回复 支持 反对

    使用道具 举报

    手机版|小黑屋|Archiver|网站错误报告|爱吱声   

    GMT+8, 2024-5-10 20:24 , Processed in 0.032351 second(s), 19 queries , Gzip On.

    Powered by Discuz! X3.2

    © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表