daxiang 发表于 2013-12-17 22:30
这种罪名为什么要脱衣搜身...
daxiang 发表于 2013-12-17 22:30
这种罪名为什么要脱衣搜身...
daxiang 发表于 2013-12-17 21:30
这种罪名为什么要脱衣搜身...
holycow 发表于 2013-12-17 21:27
记得多米尼克.卡恩吗？同样一条解释
silentdarkness 发表于 2013-12-17 21:46
印度有禁止同性恋法律？
晨枫 发表于 2013-12-17 19:50
他不是外交官吧？不受维也纳领事公约保护？
老兵帅客 发表于 2013-12-17 19:38
对啊，貌似没关系啊。
夏翁 发表于 2013-12-17 22:29
总觉得这衣服颜色不对，像三个月没洗的样子。。。哈哈哈。。。
晨枫 发表于 2013-12-18 11:51
应该有？要不印度也不会这么威胁？
李根 发表于 2013-12-18 11:56
印度女人碧池的比例高，抓马坤的比例高。
俺在这件事情上完全支持美方立场。
李根 发表于 2013-12-18 11:56
印度女人碧池的比例高，抓马坤的比例高。
俺在这件事情上完全支持美方立场。
daxiang 发表于 2013-12-18 11:30
这种罪名为什么要脱衣搜身...
齐的隆冬强 发表于 2013-12-18 21:13
总统，啥叫抓马坤
而且警方命令她脱衣搜身
领班军机 发表于 2013-12-18 00:21
上次美国警察抓了中国驻休斯敦领事，中国也抗议他们违反《维也纳外交关系公约》。不过公约的第31条提到的刑 ...
Highway 发表于 2013-12-18 08:13
Not very accurate. 是 repeated handcuffing, stripping and cavity searches
领班军机 发表于 2013-12-18 01:21
上次美国警察抓了中国驻休斯敦领事，中国也抗议他们违反《维也纳外交关系公约》。不过公约的第31条提到的刑 ...
李根 发表于 2013-12-18 22:26
中国驻休斯敦领事是个神马情况？求科普，多谢
晨枫 发表于 2013-12-18 22:16
什么情况？为的什么事情？
silentdarkness 发表于 2013-12-18 08:37
http://world.huanqiu.com/roll/2010-04/798117.html
晨枫 发表于 2013-12-18 22:44
这件事情最后是怎么解决的？不管什么理由，休斯敦警察进入领馆抓人，这是违反维也纳领事公约的。印度领事 ...
混天球 发表于 2013-12-18 10:07
有一个比较诡异的事实，那个女佣的家人已经全员抵达纽约，并从12月10日起置于米国政府的保护之下。有两个可 ...
silentdarkness 发表于 2013-12-18 10:27
三名警察声称不知道那是中国领事馆，然后被调职（有的说是停职）。休斯顿警长麦克莱兰还下令给所有担负巡 ...
晨枫 发表于 2013-12-19 00:30
休斯顿这么处理就算是解决了。不过个人对中国领事的车牌被偷还是有意不挂存疑。我在北京见过不少故意不挂 ...
silentdarkness 发表于 2013-12-18 10:35
不是没挂，是挂了前面的车牌，后面的车牌掉了。按照德州的法律，车上只要有一块牌子就算合法 ...
晨枫 发表于 2013-12-19 00:30
休斯顿这么处理就算是解决了。不过个人对中国领事的车牌被偷还是有意不挂存疑。我在北京见过不少故意不挂 ...
silentdarkness 发表于 2013-12-17 22:46
印度有禁止同性恋法律？
daxiang 发表于 2013-12-18 11:30
这种罪名为什么要脱衣搜身...
silentdarkness 发表于 2013-12-18 11:46
印度有禁止同性恋法律？
仁 发表于 2013-12-19 00:49
美国还有禁止非法同居的法律呢。只是不执行。
silentdarkness 发表于 2013-12-19 00:52
卧槽，这不是法制社会嘛，怎么搞得跟天朝一个德行呢
silentdarkness 发表于 2013-12-18 10:40
不挂车牌的习惯？很难想象一个副总领事这种官儿在京城也有这样的习惯
国内遮挡车牌扣12分，相当于吊销 ...
李根 发表于 2013-12-18 11:56
印度女人碧池的比例高，抓马坤的比例高。
俺在这件事情上完全支持美方立场。
daxiang 发表于 2013-12-18 11:30
这种罪名为什么要脱衣搜身...
晨枫 发表于 2013-12-18 22:17
这TNND也太……太……还repeated？是不是搜得high了，搜出味道来了？
猫元帅 发表于 2013-12-18 21:12
当年美苏、美欧、欧苏之间有没有这种事？
晨枫 发表于 2013-12-18 08:16
什么情况？为的什么事情？
脱衣搜身主要靠肉眼观察犯人全身，包括耳腔、鼻腔和口腔，另亦会检查腋下、胸部和性器官，犯人须向前弯腰，以便从后检查身体隐私部位。
外长库尔希德声称将不惜一切代价将科巴拉加德从美国带回来，恢复她的声誉，“这是我的责任”，他声称如果完不成这个任务将再不踏进议会。印度《经济时报》说，库尔希德是向整个国家做出保证。
老财迷 发表于 2013-12-18 22:53
美、印都很厉害啊，这个故事还有得看
在美国受辱印度女外交官遭脱衣搜身细节曝光
老财迷 发表于 2013-12-19 12:53
美、印都很厉害啊，这个故事还有得看
在美国受辱印度女外交官遭脱衣搜身细节曝光
晨枫 发表于 2013-12-19 12:56
看来印度反应激愤，中国反应振奋啊。
老马丁 发表于 2013-12-18 23:30
体腔检查。前面后面都探过了，这个很严重了，而且没有必要。美国警察要说黑也真黑。 ...
晨枫 发表于 2013-12-19 09:28
这倒是检查毒品的标准程序，只是印度女精英受不了。事实上，要是中国女外交官犯了什么事，落到美国警察手 ...
晨枫 发表于 2013-12-19 12:56
看来印度反应激愤，中国反应振奋啊。
A lot of facts has been advertised falsely by NY DA. 1st of all compensation for the maid is not made by Devyani but rather by Indian government who also pays for the maids medical, boarding, food as well as clothes and transportation. Secondly she was issued E3 visa on official passport and NOT on Indian passport. So there is conflict in her status as well because E3 visa application requires to US compensation rate but sticking it on official diplomatic passport relives her for that requirement. This conflict needs to be addressed bilaterally by talks NOT by isolating Devyani's case and targeting her. She is NOT a human trafficker or one who held her maid in chains. Maid or her lawyer found this loophole and framed case against her and in essence India. Also applying word of law, US embassy in any part of world is considered US soil so if locals work in US embassy outside US do they need valid work visa to enter premise and most importantly are the locals working in US embassy being paid US salaries?? Hell NO! There are always grey area when diplomats come as laws of 2 nations overlap but this is not how one should handle the case. IF SO THAN WHY DIDN'T RUSSIAN DIPLOMATS & THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS WHO ARE ACCUSED OF $1.2 MILLION MEDICAID FRAUD NOT ARRESTED? US blatantly screwed up here!!
...
Do you really think Indian official picked one single isolated event to play hardball with US?
As per Vienna Convention "
Article 40 states “The receiving State shall treat consular officers with due respect and shall take all appropriate steps to prevent any attack on their person, freedom or dignity.” The New York City Police has violated this article.
Article 43 says, “1. Consular officers shall not be liable to arrest or detention pending trial, except in the case of a grave crime and pursuant to a decision by the competent judicial authority.”
The alleged offence of making a false declaration in visa application and not paying the legal minimum wage is not a “grave crime” by any reckoning. The atrocities of stripping, body cavity searches, and picking her up while she was dropping her children at school are absolutely unacceptable and despicable
Morever, Article 47
Exemption From Work Permits
Members of the consular post shall, with respect to services rendered for the sending State, be exempt from any obligations in regard to work permits imposed by the laws and regulations of the receiving State concerning the employment of foreign labour.
Members of the private staff of consular officers and of consular employees shall, if they do not carry on any other gainful occupation in the receiving State, be exempt from the obligations referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article
Highway 发表于 2013-12-19 14:59
A few comments I just read
| 欢迎光临 爱吱声 (http://aswetalk.net/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.2 |
