Boeing and the FAA, having held out almost to the point of ridicule, needed a face-saving reason if it was to perform a U-turn and, in the absence of recorder information, found one in a vague reference to "refined satellite data".
Caution previously considered unnecessary was suddenly in abundance, and the US side duly fell into line. But not soon enough to avoid the perception that the tails of political interest might be wagging some regulatory dogs.
Little elaboration has emerged as to why this satellite data, in itself, was sufficient to dislodge a fervent conviction that the 737 Max was sound. One enigmatic, probably unanswerable, curiosity is whether the same data would have prompted a unilateral grounding order by the FAA if there had been no rising tide of bans and prohibitions from other regulators. And if not, why not?
五月 发表于 2019-3-16 00:47
这次欧盟和土共重开禁令恐怕不像以前那么容易了。显然波音还没做好长期斗争的准备 ...
holycow 发表于 2019-3-15 23:29
Non-revenue ferry flight可以申请one-off permit。
所以先填满Boeing Field, Everett, Moses Lake, 再不 ...
常挨揍 发表于 2019-3-16 10:25
上次787锂电池事故也是稀里糊涂的就复飞了
笔笔 发表于 2019-3-15 20:51
晨大写过这个,是又换会常规电池了吗?@晨枫
五月 发表于 2019-3-16 00:47
这次欧盟和土共重开禁令恐怕不像以前那么容易了。显然波音还没做好长期斗争的准备 ...
欢迎光临 爱吱声 (http://aswetalk.net/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.2 |